On October 10, 20 participants assembled at the ICA-USA Greenrise in Uptown Chicago for two workshops to a) discuss what we mean when we talk about commons and b) create an action plan for assembling key Chicagoans by May 1, 2016 to form Chicago’s Chamber of Commons. During the day it became clear that the many perspectives in the room meant that defining a Chamber of Commons was a complex task. Steve Ediger and Michelle Halle Stern co-facilitated the workshops. Participants engaged in deep conversation, and, based on feedback received, everybody felt that it was a productive use of their time. This report documents the outcomes of the proceedings and maps a path to the founding of Chicago’s first Chamber of Commons in May of 2016.
In our consensus workshop, we asked and answered the question, “What do we mean when we talk about Commons?” To set the context, we discussed The Commons, Short and Sweet, an article by David Bollier. With this article, participants gained an orientation of traditional and modern frames of the term commons, how commons can only be defined in conjunction with commoners, a community that has come together to manage a commons, how enclosure of commons results in dispossession, and that new structures and law is needed to promote commons and their preservation. The discussion was lively, and the participants welcomed this preamble to set the stage for our discussion on commons.
After setting the context, participants began individual work by listing their ideas about the meaning of commons. Then they split into pairs and shared ideas, picking out their most well-expressed ideas. Michelle Halle Stern facilitated collection of these and pairing them into linked ideas. Subsequently all of the ideas were brought up and clustered into groups. We ended up with six clusters of ideas, covering all of the unique thoughts that the participants had about the question, “What do we mean when we talk about Commons?”
This was the final work product of the consensus workshop. The next table documents the outcomes in text.
|Steward-ship of Nature||How we Organize||Land Stewardship||Health, Wellness and Human Potential||Mobility and Trans-porta-tion||Open Access to Knowledge|
|Right to safe food, water & air||Decision-
|Community land trust||Open access to medical care||Integrated transportation||Unbiased, uncensored and complete news|
|Clean air & water globally as basic right||Free Associations of people||Community Gardens||Means of survival/ wellness||Public transportation & bike paths||Free & open sharing of knowledge for all|
|Rainwater and rivers||Expectation of safety, security & protection||Balance of nature/urban space||Traditional food/medicine access & knowledge||Open source farm equipment|
|Access to renewable energy resources||Goodwill exchange barter||Protect public access to lakefront||Divert edible food waste for eating||Nuclear family knowledge shared communally|
|Healthy sunlight||Experience of reality based on relational agreement||Access food waste for composting||Food, housing, & education to nurture one’s full expression of being human||Worldview, mindset, lens, affiliation, ethic system, behaviour
|Cities as commons||Protect views||Indigenous traditional knowledge|
|Our public servants||Managing built environment for community’s benefit||The airwaves|
We would invite you to consider this as an early starting point in defining what we mean when we talk about Commons. This was a brainstorm, not a study group, and ideas the participants came up with in one session. We all started at different places and not everyone had done much study about Commons. Additional writing on a definition of Commons can be found in “Commons Transition Plan”. David Bollier has a rich bibliography on his site.
Action Planning Workshop
In the afternoon, we went into action and planned how we might get a (symbolic) 200 key Chicagoland commoners out to an event in May of 2016 at which we will found Chicago’s first Chamber of Commons.
We started with a context, starting with the work that we had done in the morning around defining Commons and asking the following questions:
- Why do we need a chamber of commons?
- What does the chamber of commons do?
- We know that 20 people will not do this by themselves. We need to engage others, that’s what we want to plan. How do we get the 100-200 key people in the the room to plan the opening of Chicago’s first Chamber of Commons?
- When should we target for that workshop?
We reviewed the background and current events that are taking place globally
- International Events
- National Groups & Websites
- Events leading up to this event
After establishing a context, we started considering our plan.First, we imagined a Victory celebration when we’ve gathered the (symbolically) 200 key Chicagoland commoners in the room to found Chicago’s first
Chamber of Commons.
Someone commented, “The 20 people in this room will put together a team of 200 and 20,000 will know about it.”
Then we reviewed our Current Reality in relation to that Victory. What strengths, weaknesses, benefits & dangers exist in our current situation that will lead to or inhibit success?
These powerful images grounded our victory in our current situation, both positive and cautious.
We reviewed our imagined victory in light of our current reality and made a Commitment, with consensus as a group. Here is our commitment:
“By May 1st, 2016, we will understand the Commons Transition Plan, clarify the message, define the Chamber of Commons as a model with scope, outcomes and needs, and design a call to action, including process checks that brings our neighbors and co-creators together to found Chicago’s Chamber of Commons.”
With our commitment in hand, we brainstormed and clustered the Key Actions that it will take to accomplish our goal of assembling the (symbolic) 200 key Chicagoland commoners to found Chicago’s first Chamber of Commons by May 1st, 2016. Here is that image.
The clusters represent teams, which broke out into small groups to consider their tasks, add any missing items and come up with a name that represents the work they will do. When there was an imbalance of self-selected membership, two of the teams, Stakeholders and Outreach decided to merge and we ended up with 4 teams, Core, Plan/Execute Commons Kick-off, Civic Engagement, and Educate.
The teams then assigned (loose) dates to their tasks and put them up on a Calendar (below)
Here are the tasks as defined and calendared.
|Core||Identify/ Invite core team members||Identify/ Invite core team members||Process checks in place||Process checks in place||Process checks in place||Identify/ Invite core team members|
|Distribute Commons Transition Plan. Read and discuss||Distill message of purpose
Reconvene to define process system
|Process checks in place|
|Define task areas
Define task teams
|Check for diversity/ inclusiveness||Check for diversity/ inclusiveness||Check for diversity/ inclusiveness||Check for diversity/ inclusiveness||Check for diversity/ inclusiveness||Check for diversity/ inclusiveness||Check for diversity/ inclusiveness||Check for diversity/ inclusiveness|
|Plan/ Execute CoC Kick-off||Form Kick-off team||Secure venue||Decide day plan for Kick-off||Keynote/ Master of Ceremonies||Plan process & prepare materials||Host Kick-off|
|Coordinate civic engagement team||May Day kick-off vision||Food plan||Arrange for music and humor at event|
|Breakouts||Task setup and cleanup|
|Community Engagement||Identify key players||Clarify needs from co-creators||Bringe forth voiceless activists||Create key points for elevator speech||Create call to send|
|Create initial intro statement||Poll/survey existing initiatives about need–offer strawman||Clear concise elevator speech||Co-create inspiring, captivating invitation|
|Create outreach plan||Engage other groups|
|Create list of engaged groups|
|Map assets and co-creators|
|Check invitation list for diversity and inclusiveness|
|Educate||Gather p2p and source materials info on commons||Digest core materials||Research local enclosure incidents||Create education documents/info/content||Publish enclosure incidents|
|ID and compile core materials||Read and digest ‘A Commons Transition Plan”||Create education plan|
|Explore economics of interaction||Identify basic human needs|
|Explore & educate with existing resources|
It took a long time for the group to reach consensus on the Commitment and by the time we got to Coordination, looking at the calendar and tasks to identify incongruities among dependent tasks across teams, we were almost out of time. Whether, or not, we had true consensus remains to be seen as we execute tasks. Two items came up that I (Steve) as a facilitator, thought were problematic. 1) One participant thought that we should be going two rounds, a build up to the next meeting in May and then another build-up to the founding of the Chamber of Commons the meeting after that. 2) The education team has a schedule that is too late for civic engagement. Since most of the issues at this event arose around a lack of education before the event, this might pose some problems downstream. [NOTE: Speaking personally, I see the risk and believe that it does not jeopardize the timeline significantly; however we should work closely with the Educate team to ensure no slippage.]
Finally, we Resolved to move ahead with this. In fact, several members from different teams have communicated they are moving already.